




Table of Contents Page
2......... Project Information
2.3
Construction
Programme and Activities
2.5
Status
of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits
3......... Environmental Monitoring Requirements
3.1
Construction
Dust Monitoring
3.2
Construction
Noise Monitoring
4......... Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
5.1
Construction
Dust Monitoring
5.2
Regular
Construction Noise Monitoring
6......... ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION AND AUDIT
7......... Environmental Non-conformance
7.1
Summary
of Monitoring Exceedances
7.2
Summary
of Environmental Non-Compliance
7.3
Summary
of Environmental Complaints
7.4
Summary
of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecutions
8.1
Construction
Programme for the Next Three Months
8.2
Key
Issues for the Coming Month
8.3
Monitoring
Schedule for the Coming Month
9......... ConclusionS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
List of Tables
Table 2.1......... Construction
Activities in the reporting month
Table 2.2......... Contact
Information of Key Personnel
Table 2.3......... Status of
Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits
Table 3.2 ........ Location of
Construction Dust Monitoring Station
Table 3.3 ........ Noise Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Table 3.5 ........ Noise Monitoring
Stations during Construction Phase
Table 4.1......... Status of Required
Submission under Environmental Permit
Table 6.1 ........ Observations and
Recommendations of Site Audit
Table 8.1......... Construction
Activities in the coming month
List of Figures
|
Site Layout Plan |
|
|
Location of Air Quality Monitoring Station |
|
|
Locations of Noise Monitoring Station |
List of Appendices
|
Construction Programme |
|
|
Project Organization Structure |
|
|
Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures |
|
|
Summary of Action and Limit Levels |
|
|
Event and Action Plan |
|
|
Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
|
|
Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table |
Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak West (CKR-KTW; Contract No. HY/2014/07) (hereafter called “the Project”) covers part of the construction of the Central Kowloon Route (CKR).
The Project comprises the follow works:
·
50x30m access shaft with noise enclosure at Ma Tau Kok (MTK);
·
100m long cut-and-cover (C&C) tunnel at MTK;
·
Demolition and re-provisioning of MTK Public Pier;
·
160m long underwater tunnel (UWT) (Stage 1);
·
210m long UWT (Stage 2);
·
60m long C&C tunnel at Kai Tak;
·
130m long depressed road and 200m long underpass at Kai Tak;
·
390m long underground tunnel ventilation audit at Kai Tak;
·
Seawall demolition and construction of new landing steps; and
·
Barging Point enclosure and conveyor system.
The
EM&A programme commenced on 4 April 2018.The impact EM&A for the
Project includes air quality and noise monitoring. The EM&A monitoring, including both
construction dust monitoring (monitoring station E-A14a) and construction noise
monitoring (monitoring station E-N12a and E-N21a) will be conducted by Contract
No. HY/2023/08 Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works under EP-457/2013/D from
1 October 2025.
All construction works of Contract No.
HY/2014/07 Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak West (FEP-01/457/2013/C) are
substantially completed in September 2025. The proposal of termination of the
EM&A Programme under FEP-01/457/2013/C was submitted on 28 November 2025.
EPD has approved the submission of the
proposal for termination of EM&A programme for construction stage of the
captioned Project covered under the EP No. FEP-01/457/2013/C issued on 23
December 2025. This Monthly EM&A Report (December 2025) would be
the last Monthly EM&A Report of Contract No. HY/2014/07.
This is the 93rd
monthly EM&A Report presenting the EM&A works carried out during the
period between 1 and 31 December 2025. As informed by the Contractor, major
activities in the reporting period were:
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect
rectification works at Public Transport Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Nil |
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
The EM&A monitoring, including both construction
dust monitoring (monitoring station E-A14a) will be conducted by Contract No.
HY/2023/08 Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works under EP-457/2013/D from 1
October 2025. Details of the corresponding monitoring results, and wind data,
could be referred to Sections 3 of the corresponding Monthly EM&A Report
for Contract No. HY/2023/08.
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Noise
Regular Noise
Monitoring
The EM&A monitoring, construction noise monitoring (monitoring
station E-N12a and E-N21a) will be conducted by Contract No. HY/2023/08 Central
Kowloon Route – Remaining Works under EP-457/2013/D from 1 October 2025.
Details of the corresponding monitoring results could be referred to Sections 3
of the corresponding Monthly EM&A Report for Contract No. HY/2023/08.
No exceedance of Action and Limit level of noise was
recorded in the reporting month.
Complaint, Notification of Summons and Successful
Prosecution
No environmental related complaints, notification of summons
and successful prosecution were received in the reporting month.
Reporting Changes
No report changes in the
reporting period.
Future Key Issues
All construction works of Contract No.
HY/2014/07 Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak West (FEP-01/457/2013/C) are
substantially completed in September 2025. The proposal of termination of the
EM&A Programme under FEP-01/457/2013/C was submitted on 28 November 2025.
EPD has approved the submission of the
proposal for termination of EM&A programme for construction stage of the
captioned Project covered under the EP No. FEP-01/457/2013/C issued on 23
December 2025. This Monthly EM&A Report (December 2025) would be
the last Monthly EM&A Report of Contract No. HY/2014/07.
Key issues to be considered in the next month included:
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect rectification works at Public Transport
Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Nil. |
·
Section 1: Introduction
·
Section 2: Project Information
·
Section 3: Environmental Monitoring Requirement
·
Section 4: Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
·
Section 5: Monitoring Results
·
Section 6: Environmental Site Inspection and Audit
·
Section 7: Environmental Non-conformance
·
Section 8: Future Key Issues
· Section 9: Conclusions and Recommendations
(a) construction of approximately 160m long cut-and-cover tunnel and 370m long underwater tunnel between the tunnel section at Ma Tau Kok and the depressed road of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;
(b) reconstruction of the seawall at Ma Tau Kok public pier, and the sloping seawall at the Former Kai Tak Airport Runway;
(c) construction of approximately 125m long depressed road and 200m long underpass of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;
(d) construction of approximately 360m long underground tunnel ventilation adit of the CKR;
(e) reconstruction of Kowloon City Ferry Pier Public Transport Interchange; and
(f) other associated works.
Table 2.1
Construction Activities in the reporting month
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect rectification works at Public Transport
Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Nil |
Table 2.2
Contact Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Role |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
Fax |
|
Arup-Mott MacDonald Joint Venture |
Residential Engineer (ER) |
Engineer’s Representative |
Mr. Patrick Lo |
36195901 |
2268 3954 |
|
ERM |
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Independent Environmental Checker |
Ms. Mandy To |
2271 3113 |
3015 8052 |
|
Gammon |
Contractor |
Contracts Manager |
Mr. Kin Fai Tam |
2516 8823 |
2516 6260 |
|
Environmental Manager |
Ms. Michelle Tang |
9267 8866 |
2516 6260 |
||
|
AECOM |
Contractor’s Environmental Team (ET) |
ET Leader |
Mr. Y. W. Fung |
3856 5681 |
2317 7609 |
Table 2.3
Status of Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits
|
Permit / License No. / Notification/ Reference No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
Remarks |
|
|
From |
To |
|||
|
Further Environmental Permit |
||||
|
FEP-01/457/2013/C |
28 Feb 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
Wastewater Discharge License |
||||
|
WT00043692-2023 |
1 Apr 2023 |
31 Mar 2028 |
Valid |
Ma Tau Kok |
|
WT00043881-2023 |
30 Jun 2023 |
30 Jun 2028 |
Valid |
Underwater Tunnel Stage 2 |
|
WT00044013-2023 |
7 May 2025 |
30 Apr 2028 |
Valid |
Kai Tak and Underwater Tunnel Stage 1 |
|
Construction Noise Permit |
||||
|
GW-RE0157-25 |
7 Mar 2025 |
6 Sep 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Ma Tau Kok |
|
GW-RE0631-25 |
15 Jun 2025 |
14 Dec 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Kai Tak |
|
GW-RE0418-25 |
30 Apr 2025 |
29 Oct 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Stage 1 Underwater Tunnel |
|
GW-RE0581-25 |
7 Jun 2025 |
6 Nov 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Stage 2 Underwater Tunnel |
|
GW-RE0233-25 |
19 Mar 2025 |
18 Sep 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
Kai Tak Access Road |
|
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
||||
|
5118-247-G2347-47 |
30 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
5118-247-G2347-48 |
30 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
Marine Dumping Permit |
||||
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
Billing Account for Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
|
7029909 |
22 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Account Active |
-- |
|
Notification Under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
|
429442 |
5 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Notified |
-- |
|
|
||||
Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring Equipment
Table 3.1
Location of Construction Dust
Monitoring Station
|
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
|
E-A14a [1] |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
[1] The air monitoring station proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e.
Wyler Gardens with ID: E-A14) was not available for impact dust monitoring,
therefore impact monitoring was conducted at E-A14a as an alternative which was
agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.
Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
Monitoring Requirements
Table 3.2
Noise Monitoring Parameters,
Frequency and Duration
|
Parameter and Duration |
Frequency |
|
30-mins measurement at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and L90 would be recorded. |
At least once per week |
Monitoring Locations
Table 3.3
Noise Monitoring Stations during
Construction Phase
|
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Measurement |
|
E-N12a [1] |
19 Hing Yan Street |
Rooftop (9/F) |
Façade |
|
E-N21a [1] |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
Free field[2] |
Notes:
[1] The noise
monitoring stations proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e. Grand Waterfront
Tower 3 with ID: E-N12 and Hang Chien Court Block J with ID: E-N21) were not
available for impact noise monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was
conducted at E-N12a and E-N21a as an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.
[2] A
correction of +3 dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
Table 4.1
Status of Required Submission under Environmental Permit
|
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
|
Condition
3.4 of |
Monthly EM&A Report for November 2025 |
12 December 2025 |
Table 6.1
Observations and Recommendations of
Site Audit
|
Parameters |
Date |
Observations and Recommendations |
Follow-up |
|
Air Quality |
17 December 2025 |
·
Reminder: ·
The contractor was reminded to provide
sandbags at the boundary of breaking area, to prevent surface runoff by
watering at MTK site. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 24 December 2025. |
|
Noise |
Nil |
·
Nil |
Nil |
|
Water Quality |
Nil |
·
Nil |
Nil |
|
Waste/ Chemical Management |
10 December 2025
|
·
Reminder: |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 17 December 2025.
|
|
Landscape & Visual |
Nil |
·
Nil |
Nil |
|
Permits/ Licenses |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
*The item was under rectification on last reporting month.
Table 8.1
Construction Activities in the coming month
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect rectification works at Public Transport
Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Nil. |




3 Air
Quality and Noise Monitoring
6 Summary of
Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
9 Conclusion
and Recommendations
Appendices
Appendix A Alignment and Works Site in Kai Tak West Area for Contract
No. HY/2023/08
Appendix B Construction
Programme
Appendix C Project Organization Chart
Appendix
D Event and Action Plan (EAP)
(Air Quality Monitoring)
Appendix
E Event and Action Plan (EAP) (Noise
Monitoring)
Appendix
F Environmental Mitigation
Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
Appendix G Location Plan of Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Station
Appendix H Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month and Coming Month
Appendix I Calibration Certificates for Air Quality Monitoring
Equipment
Appendix J Air Quality Monitoring Results and their Graphical
Presentations
Appendix K Calibration Certificates for Noise Monitoring Equipment
Appendix L Noise Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentations
Appendix
M Waste Flow Table
Appendix
N Statistics on Complaint,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
1.1.1
Build King - Tung Lee Joint Venture (“Contractor”)
commenced the construction works of Highway Department (HyD) Central Kowloon
Route Contract No. HY/2023/08 – Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works at Kai
Tak West Area (“The Project”) on 11 November 2024. This is the 14th
monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) report presenting the
EM&A works carried out in the Kai Tak West Area during the period from 1 December 2025 to 31 December 2025.
1.1.2
A summary of major construction
activities informed by the Contractor for the Project during the reporting
period is presented below.
|
Construction Activities Undertaken in
Kai Tak West Area |
|
·
Finishes (floor & wall) installation at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Staircase construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck |
Environmental Monitoring and
Audit Works
1.1.3
Regular construction air quality monitoring (24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP)
and noise monitoring activities in the reporting month is summarised in below:
-
At Monitoring Station E-A14a on 4, 10, 16, 22 and 27 December 2025
-
At Monitoring Station E-N12a and EN-21a
on 4, 10, 16, 22 and 27 December 2025
1.1.4
Joint weekly site inspections were conducted by representatives of the
Environmental team (ET), the Contractor and the Engineer on 3, 12, 19 and 24 December 2025. A joint site inspection with
the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) was undertaken on 12 December 2025. Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of
landscape and visual mitigation measures was conducted by the ET on 3 and 19 December 2025. Details of the audit findings
and implementation status are presented in Section 7. Details of waste management are presented in Section
4.
1.1.5
A summary of the non-compliance (exceedance) during the reporting period
is provided below.
-
No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 1-hour
TSP was recorded.
-
No Action / Limit Level exceedance for
24-hour TSP was recorded.
-
No Action / Limit Level exceedance for
construction noise was recorded.
Complaints, Notification of
Summons and Successful Prosecution
1.1.6
No environmental related complaints, notification of summons and
successful prosecution were received in the reporting period.
Reporting Changes
1.1.7
There were no reporting changes during the reporting period.
Future Key Issues
1.1.8
A summary of construction activities informed by the Contractor for the
next reporting period are listed below:
|
Construction Activities To be Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
|
·
Finishes (floor & wall) installation
at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Finishes installation on Ramp at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
E&M works at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck ·
Staircase Construction at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
1.1.1
Central Kowloon Route (CKR) is a 4.7 km long dual 3-lane trunk road in
Central Kowloon linking Yau Ma Tei Interchange in West Kowloon with the road
network on Kai Tak Development and Kowloon Bay in East Kowloon.
1.1.2
The Central Kowloon Route – Design and Construction Environmental Impact
Assessment Report (Register No.: AEIAR-171/2013) was approved with conditions
by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) on 11 July 2013. An
Environmental Permit (EP-457/2013) was issued on 9 August 2013. Variations of EP (VEP) was
subsequently applied for and the latest EP (EP-457/2013/D) was issued by EPD on
15 June 2021.
1.1.3
The construction of the CKR had been divided into different sections. Contract No. HY/2023/08 – Central Kowloon
Route – Remaining Works covers part of the construction activities located at
Kai Tak West Area and Yau Ma Tei Area under the EP, including:
1.1.4
The works site at Kai Tak West Area for the Contract No. HY/2023/08 are
shown in Appendix A.
1.2
Purpose of the Report
1.2.1
This is the 14th monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) report presenting
the EM&A works carried out for the Project in the Kai Tak West Area during
the period from 1 December 2025 to 31 December 2025.
1.3
Construction Activities Undertaken
During the Reporting Period
1.3.1
A summary of major construction activities carried out during the
reporting period are presented in Table 1.1. The construction programme is
presented in Appendix B.
Table 1.1 Summary of Construction
Activities during the Reporting Period
|
Construction Activities Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
Progress |
|
·
Finishes (floor & wall) at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
95% |
|
·
Staircase Construction at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
40% |
1.4
Project Organisation
1.4.1
The project organization structure is shown in Appendix C. The
key personnel contact names and numbers for the Project are summarized in Table 1.2.
Table
1.2 Contact
Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Role |
Position |
Name |
Contact No. |
|
Arup – Mott
MacDonald Joint Venture |
Engineer’s
Representative (“ER”) |
Resident Engineer
(Environmental) |
Ms. Jim Li |
9120 1157 |
|
ERM – Hong Kong
Limited |
Independent
Environmental Checker (“IEC”) |
IEC |
Ms. Mandy To |
2271 3313 |
|
Aurecon Hong Kong
Limited |
Environmental
Team (“ET”) |
ET Leader |
Mr. F.C. Tsang |
3664 6801 |
|
Build King – Tung
Lee Joint Venture |
Contractor |
Environmental
Officer |
Mr. Tony Tsoi |
9689 8956 |
1.5
Status of
Environmental Licences, Notification and Permit
1.5.1
A summary of the valid permits, licences, and/ or notifications on
environmental protection for this Project is presented in Table 1.3.
Table
1.3 Summary
of the Environmental Licence, Notification, Permit and Documentations
|
Permit/ License/ Notification /
Reference No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
Remark |
||
|
From |
To |
|
|
||
|
Environmental
Permit |
|||||
|
EP-457/2013/D |
15 June 2021 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Wastewater
Discharge License |
|||||
|
WT00046473-2025 |
9 May 2025 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Notification of
Construction Works Under the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust
Regulation) |
|||||
|
10007346 |
25 July 2024 |
End of Project |
Notified |
-- |
|
|
Chemical Waste
Producer Registration |
|||||
|
5213-286-B2767-02 |
19 March 2025 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Billing Account
for Disposal of Construction Waste |
|||||
|
7051793 |
6 August 2024 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Y-Park Membership |
|||||
|
C0280 |
12 August 2024 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Construction Noise
Permit |
|||||
|
GW-RE1157-25 |
25 September 2025 |
21 March 2026 |
Valid |
General
Activities at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
|
|
Collection of
Public Fill at Public Fill Reception Facility |
|||||
|
TKO137-HY/2023/08-02 |
1 July 2025 |
31 December 2025 |
Valid |
-- |
|
2.1
Environmental Permit (EP) Submission
Status
2.1.1
Environmental permit (EP) conditions under the EIAO, submission status
under the EP and implementation status of mitigation measures had been reviewed
and implemented on schedule. The status
of required submissions under the EP (EP-457/2013/D) during the reporting
period for the Project are summarised in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Summary of Status of Required
Submission for EP-457/2013/D for the Project
|
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
|
3.4 |
Monthly EM&A Report – Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscape Deck (November 2025) |
12 December 2025 |
3
Air Quality and Noise Monitoring
3.1
Air Quality
Monitoring Requirements
3.1.1
In accordance with the approved EM&A Manual, measurement of 24-hour
and 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) level at the designated air
quality monitoring station is required. Impact 24-hour TSP monitoring should be
carried out for at least once every 6 days, and 1-hour TSP monitoring should be
done at least 3 times every 6 days while the highest dust impact is expected.
Monitoring Equipment
3.1.2
24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was performed using High Volume
Sampler (HVS) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all
the requirements of the EM&A Manual. A portable direct reading dust meter
was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring.
3.1.3
A summary of the equipment that was deployed for the air quality
monitoring is shown in Table 3.1.
Table
3.1 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment
|
Monitoring Parameter |
Monitoring Equipment |
Serial Number |
Date of Calibration |
|
24-hour TSP |
High Volume Sampler |
1087 |
28 November 2025 |
|
Calibration Kit |
4166 |
8 May 2025 |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
Digital Dust Indicator |
467361 |
15 August 2025 |
Monitoring Locations
3.1.4
The monitoring station for air quality monitoring pertinent to the
Project has been identified based on the approved EM&A Manual for the
Project. The location of the air quality
monitoring station is summarized in Table 3.2 and shown in Appendix G.
Table
3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Station
|
Location I.D. |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
|
E-A14a (1) |
Block
B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop
(13/F) |
|
Note: (1) The
air monitoring station proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e. Wyler Gardens
with ID: E-A14) was not available for impact dust monitoring, therefore
impact monitoring was conducted at E-A14a as an alternative which was agreed
by the ER, IEC and EPD. |
||
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC
3.1.5
24-hour TSP Monitoring
-
A horizontal platform with appropriate
support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.
-
Two samplers should not be placed less
than 2m apart from each other.
-
The distance between the HVS and any
obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle
protrudes above the HVS.
-
A minimum of 2 meters separation from
walls, parapets and penthouse for rooftop sampler.
-
A minimum of 2 meters separation from
any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required.
-
No furnace or incinerator flues nearby.
-
Airflow around the sampler was
unrestricted.
-
The sampler was located more than 20
meters from any dripline.
-
Any wire fence and gate, required to
protect the sampler, did not obstruct the monitoring process.
-
Permission was obtained to set up the
samplers and access to the monitoring station.
-
A secured supply of electricity was
obtained to operate the sampler.
-
Glass fibre filters, G810 were labelled
and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.
-
All filters were equilibrated in the
conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning
environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C;
the relative humidity (RH) was < 50% and not variable by more than ±5%. A
convenient working RH was 40%.
-
All filter papers were prepared and
analysed by Acumen Laboratory and Testing Limited, which is a HOKLAS accredited
laboratory and has comprehensive quality assurance and quality control
programmes.
-
The power supply was checked to ensure
the HVS works properly.
-
The filter holder and the area
surrounding the filter were cleaned.
-
The filter holder was removed by
loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a
supporting screen was aligned carefully.
-
The filter was properly aligned on the
screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the
filter.
-
The swing bolts were fastened to hold
the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied was sufficient to
avoid air leakage at the edges.
-
Then the shelter lid was closed and was
secured with the aluminium strip.
-
The HVS was warmed-up for about 5
minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.
-
A new flow rate record sheet was set
into the flow recorder.
-
On site temperature and atmospheric
pressure readings were taken and the flow rate of the HVS was checked and
adjusted at around 1.3 m3/min, and complied with the range specified in the
EM&A Manual (i.e. 0.6-1.7 m3/min).
-
The programmable digital timer was set
for a sampling period of 24 hrs, and the starting time, weather condition and
the filter number were recorded.
-
The initial elapsed time was recorded.
-
At the end of sampling, on site
temperature and atmospheric pressure readings were taken and the final flow
rate of the HVS was checked and recorded.
-
The final elapsed time was recorded.
-
The sampled filter was removed carefully
and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate
matter were in contact.
-
It was then placed in a clean envelope
and sealed.
-
All monitoring information was recorded
on a standard data sheet.
-
Filters were then sent to Acumen
Laboratory and Testing Limited for analysis.
-
The HVS and its accessories were
maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely
and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.
-
HVSs were calibrated using TE-5025A
Calibration Kit upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals.
-
Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A
Calibration Kit and the HVSs are provided in Appendix I.
-
The wind speed has been recorded from
Hong Kong Observatory- King’s Park meteorological station, along with portable
wind speed meter stand by as back up when the information is not available from
HKO.
3.1.6
1-hour TSP Monitoring
-
Turn the power on.
-
Close the air collecting opening cover.
-
Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to
[BG]
-
Push “START/STOP” switch to perform
background measurement for 6 seconds.
-
Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to
insert the light scattering plate.
-
Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon
“SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.
-
Push “START/STOP” switch to perform
automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.
-
Pull out the knob and return it to
MEASURE position.
-
Push the “TIME SETTING” switch the time
set in the display to 3 hours.
-
Lower down the air collection opening
cover.
-
Push “START/STOP” switch to start
measurement.
-
The 1-hour TSP meter was calibrated at
1-year intervals against a High Volume
Sampler. Calibration certificates of the Laser Dust Monitors
are provided in Appendix I.
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
3.1.7
The schedule for impact air quality monitoring in November 2025 is
provided in Appendix H.
Monitoring Results
3.1.8
The monitoring results for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP are summarized
in Table 3.3 and Table 3.4 respectively. Detailed air
quality monitoring results and daily extract of meteorological observations are
presented in Appendix J.
Table
3.3 Summary of 24-hour TSP Monitoring
Result in the Reporting Period
|
Location I.D. |
Range |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level |
|
E-A14a |
43 – 73 |
197.3 |
260 |
Table
3.4 Summary of 1-hour TSP Monitoring
Result in the Reporting Period
|
Location I.D. |
Range |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level |
|
E-A14a |
32 – 72 |
302.4 |
500 |
3.1.9
Major dust sources during the monitoring included construction dust and
nearby traffic emission.
Observations
3.1.10
No Action/ Limit Level exceedance was recorded for all 1-hour TSP and
24-hour TSP monitoring at the monitoring location in the reporting period.
3.1.11
The event and action plan are annexed in Appendix D.
3.1.12
Site audits were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor and audit the
timely implementation of air quality mitigation measures within the site
boundaries of this Project. A summary of
observation during the site audits is shown in Table 7.1 of this report.
3.2
Noise
Monitoring
Requirements
3.2.1
In accordance with the EM&A
Manual, impact noise monitoring should be conducted for at least once a week
during the construction phase of the Project. Table 3.5 summaries the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of
impact noise monitoring.
Table 3.5 Noise Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and
Duration
|
Parameter
and Duration |
Frequency |
|
30-mins measurement at each monitoring station
between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and
L90 would be recorded. |
At
least once per week |
Monitoring Equipment
3.2.2
Noise monitoring was performed using sound level meter at each
designated monitoring station. The sound level meters deployed comply
with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications (IEC) 651:1979
(Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Acoustic calibrator was
deployed to check the sound level meters at a known sound pressure level.
A summary of equipment is given in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6 Summary of Noise Monitoring Equipment
|
Equipment |
Manufacturer
and Model |
Serial
Number |
Date
of Calibration |
|
Sound Level Meter |
NTi
XL3 |
A3A-01229-F0 |
24
July 2025 |
|
Acoustic Calibrator |
RION
NC-75 |
34724244 |
11 July 2025 |
Monitoring Locations
3.2.3
The monitoring stations for construction noise monitoring pertinent to
the Project have been identified based on the approved EM&A Manual for the
Project. Locations of the noise monitoring stations are summarized
in Table 3.7 and shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.7 Noise Monitoring Station for Construction
Phase
|
Location
I.D. |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Measurement |
|
E-N12a (1) |
19
Hing Yan Street |
Rooftop
(9/F) |
Façade |
|
E-N21a |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
Free-field (2) |
|
Note: (1) The noise monitoring stations proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e.
Grand Waterfront Tower 3 with ID: E-N12 and Hang Chien Court Block J with ID:
E-N21) were not available for impact noise monitoring, therefore impact
monitoring was conducted at E-N12a and E-N21a as an alternative which was
agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD. (2)
A correction of +3 dB(A) was made to
the free-field measurements. |
|||
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC
-
The sound level meter was set on a
tripod at a height of 1.2 m above the ground.
-
Façade measurement was made at E-N12a.
-
Free field measurements was made at
monitoring location E-N21a. A correction of +3 dB(A) shall be made to the free
field measurements.
-
The battery
condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
-
Parameters such as frequency weighting,
the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
§
frequency weighting
§
time weighting: Fast
§
time measurement: Leq(30-minutes) during
non-restricted hours i.e. 0700 – 1900 on normal weekdays.
-
Prior to and after each noise
measurement, the meter was calibrated using the acoustic calibrator for 94
dB(A) at 1000 Hz. If the difference in
the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB(A), the
measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would
be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
-
During the monitoring period, the Leq,
L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, site conditions and noise
sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
-
Noise measurement was paused during
periods of high intrusive noise (e.g. dog barking, helicopter noise) if
possible. Observations were recorded when intrusive noise was unavoidable.
-
Noise monitoring was cancelled in the
presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5m/s, or wind with
gusts exceeding 10m/s.
-
The microphone head
of the sound level meter was cleaned with soft cloth at regular
intervals.
-
The meter and calibrator were sent to
the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.
-
Calibration certificates of
the sound level meters and acoustic calibrators are provided in Appendix
K.
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting
Month
3.2.4
The schedule for impact air quality monitoring in November 2025 is
provided in Appendix H.
Monitoring Results
3.2.5
The monitoring results for noise are summarized in Table 3.8 and the monitoring data is provided in Appendix
L.
Table 3.8 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring
Results in the Reporting Period
|
Location
I.D. |
Range, dB(A), Leq (30 mins) |
Limit Level, Leq (30 mins) |
|
E-N12a |
54.7 – 62.6 |
75.0 |
|
E-N21a |
60.9 – 70.7 (1) |
75.0 |
|
Note: (1)
A correction of +3 dB(A) was made to
the free-field measurements. |
||
3.2.6
Major noise sources during the monitoring included construction noise
from the nearby construction and nearby traffic noise.
Observations
3.2.7
No Action/ Limit Level exceedance was recorded for construction noise monitoring
in the reporting period.
3.2.8
Site audits were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor and audit the
timely implementation of noise mitigation measures within the site boundaries
of this Project. A summary of observations
during the site audits is shown in Table 7.1 of this report.
4
Waste Management
4.1.1
Waste generated from this Project includes inert C&D materials and
non-inert C&D materials. Non-inert C&D materials are made up of general
refuse, vegetative wastes and recyclable wastes such as plastics and paper/ cardboard
packaging waste. Steel materials
generated from the project are also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as
the materials were not disposed of with other inert C&D materials. As
advised by the Contractor, only general refuse was generated and disposed of
during this reporting period.
4.1.2
With reference to relevant handling records and trip tickets of this
Project, the quantities of different types of waste generated in the reporting period
are summarised in Table 4.1. Details of cumulative waste management data are presented as a waste
flow table in Appendix M.
Table 4.1 Quantities
of Waste Generated from the Project in the Reporting Period
|
Reporting period |
Quantity |
||||||
|
Inert C&D Materials (in ‘000 kg) |
Chemical Waste (in ‘kg) |
Non-inert C&D Materials |
|||||
|
Others, e.g. General Refuse disposed of at
Landfill (in ‘000kg) |
Recycled materials |
|
|||||
|
Paper/ cardboard (in ‘000kg) |
Plastics (in ‘000 kg) |
Metals (in ‘000 kg) |
|
||||
|
December
2025 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
15.27 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
5.1.1
As per the EM&A Manuals, the landscape and visual mitigation
measures shall be implemented, and site inspections should be undertaken once
every two weeks during the construction period.
5.1.2
Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of landscape and visual
mitigation measures was conducted on 3 and 19 December 2025. The observations and recommendations
made during the site inspections are presented in Table 7.1. A summary of the implementation status is
presented in Appendix F.
6
Summary of Complaints, Notification of Summons
and Prosecutions
6.1.1
The environmental Complaints Handling Procedures is shown below.
|
Complaint Received via Project Hotline |
Complaint Received via 1823 or from other government departments |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractor notify ER, ET and IEC |
ER notify Contractor, ET and IEC |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractor log complaint and date of
receipt onto the complaint database. Contractor, ER and ET to conduct
investigation of complaint |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
If complaint is considered not valid |
If complaint is found valid |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
ET or ER to reply to the complainant
if necessary |
Contractor
to identify and implement remedial measures in consultation with the IEC, ET
and ER. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
The
ER, ET and IEC to review the effectiveness of the Contractor’s remedial
measures and the updated situation; ET to undertake additional monitoring and
audit to verify the situation if necessary and oversee that circumstances
leading to the complaint do not recur. ER to conduct further inspection as
necessary. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
If the complaint is referred by
the EPD, the Contractor to prepare interim report on the status of the
complaint investigation and follow-up actions stipulated above, including the
details of the remedial measures and additional monitoring identified or
already taken, for submission to EPD within the timeframe assigned by the EPD |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The ET to record the details of the
complaint, results of the investigation, subsequent actions taken to address
the complaint and updated situation including the effectiveness of the
remedial measures, supported by regular and additional monitoring results in
the monthly EM&A reports |
|||||
6.1.2
Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with
the Event and Action Plan in Appendix D and Appendix E shall be
carried out.
6.1.3
No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels of air quality (1-hour TSP
and 24-hour TSP) monitoring and noise monitoring was recorded in the reporting period.
6.1.4
No complaint was received in the reporting period.
6.1.5
No non-compliance was received in the reporting period.
6.1.6
No notification of summons and successful prosecution was received in
the reporting period.
6.1.7
Statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and successful
prosecutions are summarized in Appendix N.
7.1.1
Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the
implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation
measures under the Contract. In the reporting period,
4 site inspections were
carried out by the representative of ET, Contractor and Engineer on 3, 12, 19 and 24 December 2025, along with bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of landscape
and visual mitigation measures conducted on 3 and
19 December 2025.
7.1.2
One joint site inspection with the IEC was also undertaken on 12 December 2025. Minor deficiencies were observed during
weekly site inspection. Key observations during the site inspections are
summarized in Table 7.1.
Table
7.1 Summary of Site Observation
|
Date |
Environmental Observations |
Follow-up Status |
|
3
December 2025 |
1. Chemical
containers were observed without drip tray(s), drip tray(s) should be
provided to chemicals to avoid leakage. |
1. Chemical
containers were relocated and place inside the drip tray. (Rectified on 9
December 2025) |
|
12
December 2025 |
Nil. |
Nil. |
|
19
December 2025 |
1. A
chemical container was without drip tray, chemical container should be kept
on drip tray to avoid leakage. |
1. The
concerned chemical container was removed. (Rectified on 23 December 2025) |
|
24
December 2025 |
1. Drip
tray should be provided to chemical tank at landscape deck to avoid leakage. |
1. The
concerned chemical container was removed. (Rectified on 31 December 2025) |
7.1.3
The Contractor has rectified all observation identified during
environmental site inspection.
7.1.4
According to the EIA Study Report, Environmental Permit, contract
documents and EM&A Manual, the mitigation measures detailed in the
documents had been implemented as much as practical during the reporting
period. An updated Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
(EMIS) is provided in Appendix F.
8.1.1
The construction activities to be undertaken in the next reporting period
are listed below:
|
Construction Activities To be Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
|
·
Finishes (floor & wall) installation
at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Finishes installation on Ramp at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
E&M works at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck ·
Staircase Construction at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
8.1.2
Potential environmental impacts arising from the above construction
activities are mainly associated with dust and waste management.
8.1.3
The tentative schedule of air quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP)
monitoring and noise monitoring in the next reporting period is presented in Appendix
H.
8.1.4
The construction programme for the Project for the next reporting period is presented in Appendix
B.
9
Conclusion and Recommendations
9.1.1
This is the 14th monthly EM&A Report presenting the EM&A works undertaken in Kai
Tak West Area during the period from 1 December 2025 to 31 December 2025 in accordance with the EM&A Manual and the requirement under EP-457/2013/D.
9.1.2
Air quality monitoring (including 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and noise
monitoring were carried out in the reporting period. No exceedance of the Action or Limit Level was
recorded for air quality monitoring and noise during the reporting period.
9.1.3
Weekly environmental site inspections by representatives of the ET, the Contractor
and the Engineer were conducted during the reporting period. One joint site
inspection with the IEC was carried out on 12 December 2025. Minor
deficiencies were observed during site inspection and was rectified within
specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the Project was
therefore considered satisfactory.
9.1.4
No complaint was received in the reporting period.
9.1.5
No non-compliance situation was received in the reporting period.
9.1.6
No notification of summons or prosecution was received since
commencement of the Contract.
9.1.7
The ET will keep track on the construction works to confirm compliance
of environmental requirements and the proper implementation of all necessary
mitigation measures.
Appendix A
Alignment and Works Site in Kai Tak West Area for
Contract No. HY/2023/08
Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped
Deck

Appendix B
Construction Programme

Appendix C
Project Organisation Chart
Appendix D
Event and Action Plan (EAP) (Air Quality
Monitoring)
|
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM (ET) |
INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKER (IEC) |
ENGINEER’S REPRESENTATIVE (ER) |
CONTRACTOR |
|
|
ACTION LEVEL |
||||
|
Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify source, investigate the causes of
exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform IEC and ER; 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method. |
1. Notify Contractor. |
1. Rectify any unacceptable practice; 2. Amend working methods if appropriate. |
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Identify source; 2. Inform IEC and ER; 3. Advise the
ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4. Repeat
measurements to confirm findings; 5. Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 6. Discuss with
IEC and Contractor on remedial actions required; 7. If
exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER; 8. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss with
ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise the
ET on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise implementation
of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Submit proposals for remedial actions to ER
within 3 working days of notification; 2. Implement the agreed proposals; 3. Amend proposal if appropriate. |
|
LIMIT LEVEL |
||||
|
Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify source, investigate the causes of
exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform ER, Contractor and EPD; 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5. Assess
effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER
informed of the results. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss with
ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise the
ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise
implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance; 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC
within 3 working days of notification; 3. Implement the agreed proposals; 4. Amend proposal if appropriate. |
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Notify IEC,
ER, Contractor and EPD; 2. Identify source; 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm findings; 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5. Carry out
analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation
to be implemented; 6. Arrange
meeting with IEC and ER to discuss the remedial actions to be taken; 7. Assess
effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER
informed of the results; 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Discuss
amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 2. Review
Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in
writing; 2. Notify
Contractor; 3. In consultation with the IEC, agree with the
Contractor on the remedial measures to be implemented; 4. Ensure remedial measures properly
implemented; 5. If exceedance continues, consider what
portion of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that
portion of work until the exceedance is abated. |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance; 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC
within 3 working days of notification; 3. Implement the agreed proposals; 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under
control; 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated. |
Appendix E
Event and Action Plan (EAP) (Noise
Monitoring)
|
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
TEAM (ET) |
INDEPENDENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKER (IEC) |
ENGINEER’S
REPRESENTATIVE ER |
CONTRACTOR |
|
|
Action Level |
1. Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose
remedial measures; 2. Notify IEC and Contractor; 3. Report the results of
investigation to the IEC, ER and Contractor; 4. Discuss with the Contractor
and formulate remedial measures; 5. Increase
monitoring frequency to check mitigation effectiveness. |
1. Review the analysed results
submitted by the ET; 2. Review the proposed remedial
measures by the Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Supervise the implementation
of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of
notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify
Contractor; 3. Require
Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem; 4. Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented |
1. Submit noise mitigation
proposals to IEC; 2. Implement
noise mitigation proposals. |
Appendix F
Environmental Mitigation Implementation
Schedule (EMIS)
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule
|
EIA Ref. |
EM&A Log Ref. |
Recommended Mitigation
Measures |
Objectives of the
Recommended Measures & Main Concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Location / Timing |
Implementation Stage |
Requirements and/ or
standards to be achieved |
Implementation Status |
|
|
Construction Dust Impact |
|||||||||
|
S4.3.10 |
D1 |
The contractor shall follow the procedures and
requirements given in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation and Air Pollution Control (Non-road Mobile Machinery) (Emission)
Regulation. |
Minimize dust impact and adverse health effects at
the nearby sensitive receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· APCO · To control the dust impact to meet HKAQO and
TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D2 |
· Mitigation measures in form of regular watering
under a good site practice should be adopted.
Watering once per hour on exposed worksites and haul road should be
conducted to achieve dust removal efficiencies of 91.7%. While the above
watering frequencies are to be followed, the extent of watering may vary
depending on actual site conditions but should be sufficient to maintain an
equivalent intensity of no less than 1.3 L/m2 to achieve the dust
removal efficiency. |
Minimize dust impact at the nearby sensitive
receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· APCO · To control the dust impact to meet HKAQO and
TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D3 |
· Proper watering at exposed spoil should be
undertaken throughout the construction phase; · Any excavated or stockpile of dusty material
should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting or sprayed with water to
maintain the entire surface wet and then removed or backfilled or reinstated
where practicable within 24 hours of the excavation or unloading; · Any dusty materials remaining after a stockpile
is removed should be wetted with water and cleared from the surface of roads; · A stockpile of dusty material should not be
extended beyond the pedestrian barriers, fencing or traffic cones; · The load of dusty materials on a vehicle leaving
a construction site should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting to
ensure that the dusty materials do not leak from the vehicle. · Where practicable, vehicle washing facilities
with high pressure water jet should be provided at every discernible or
designated vehicle exit point. The
area where vehicle washing takes place and the road section between the
washing facilities and the exit point should be paved with concrete,
bituminous materials or hardcores; · When there are open excavation and reinstatement
works, hoarding of not less than 2.4m high should be provided and properly
maintained as far as practicable along the site boundary with provision for
public crossing. Good site practice
shall also be adopted by the Contractor to ensure the conditions of the
hoardings are properly maintained throughout the construction period; · The portion of any road leading only to
construction site that is within 30m of a vehicle entrance or exit should be
kept clear of dusty materials; · Surfaces where any pneumatic or power-driven
drilling, cutting, polishing or other mechanical breaking operation takes
place should be sprayed with water or a dust suppression chemical
continuously; · Any area that involves demolition activities
should be sprayed with water or a dust suppression chemical immediately prior
to, during and immediately after the activities so as to maintain the entire
surface wet; · Any skip hoist for material transport should be
totally enclosed by impervious sheeting; · Every stock of more than 20 bags of cement or
dry-pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should be covered entirely by impervious
sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides; · Loading, unloading, transfer, handling or storage
of bulk cement or dry PFA should be carried out in a totally enclosed system
or facility, and any vent or exhaust should be fitted with an effective
fabric filter or equivalent air pollution control system · Exposed earth should be properly treated by
compaction, turfing, hydroseeding, vegetation planting or sealing with latex,
vinyl, bitumen, shotcrete or other suitable surface stabilizer within six
months after the last construction activity on the construction site or part
of the construction site where the exposed earth lies. |
Minimize dust impact at the nearby sensitive
receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· APCO · To control the dust impact to meet HKAQO and
TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented, rectified after reminder for 1st
bullet. Implemented for the 2nd to 6th
bullet. N/A for
other bullets. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D6 |
Implement regular dust monitoring under EM&A
programme during the construction stage. |
Monitoring of dust impact |
Contractor |
Selected rep. dust monitoring station |
Construction stage |
· TM-EIA |
Implemented |
|
|
Construction Noise
(Airborne) |
|||||||||
|
S5.4.1 |
N1 |
Implement the following good site practices: · Only well-maintained plant should be operated
on-site, and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction
programme; · Machines and plant (such as trucks, cranes) that
may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should
be throttled down to a minimum; · Plant known to emit noise strongly in one
direction, where possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away
from nearby NSRs; · Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment
should be properly fitted and maintained during the construction works; · Mobile plant should be sited as far away from
NSRs as possible and practicable; · Material stockpiles, mobile container site office
and other structures should be effectively utilized, where practicable, to
screen noise from on-site construction activities. |
Control construction airborne noise |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
Implemented for the 1st, 2nd,
5th bullets, N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N2 |
Install temporary hoarding located on the site
boundaries between noisy construction activities and NSRs. The conditions of hoardings shall be
properly maintained throughout the construction period. |
Reduce the construction noise levels at low-level
zone of NSRs through partial screening |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N3 |
Install movable noise barriers (typical design is
wooden framed barrier with a small-cantilevered on a skid footing with 25mm
thick internal sound absorptive lining), acoustic mat or full enclosure,
screen the noisy plants including air compressors, generators and handheld
breakers, etc. |
Screen the noisy plant items to be used at all
construction sites |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N4 |
Use ‘Quiet plant’ |
Reduce the noise levels of plant items |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N5 |
Loading/ unloading activities should be carried
out inside the full enclosure of mucking out points. |
Reduce the noise levels of loading/ unloading
activities |
Contractor |
Mucking out locations |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N6 |
Sequencing operation of construction plants where
practicable. |
Operate sequentially within the same work site to
reduce the construction airborne noise |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N7 |
Implement a noise monitoring programme under
EM&A programme. |
Monitor the construction noise levels at the
selected representative locations |
Contractor |
Selected rep. noise monitoring station |
Construction stage |
· TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
Water Quality
(Construction Phase) |
|||||||||
|
S6.9.1.1 |
W1 |
In accordance with the Practice Note for
Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage, Environmental Protection
Department, 2023 (ProPECC PN 2/23), construction phase mitigation measures
shall include the following: Construction Runoff · At the start of site establishment, perimeter
cut-off drains to direct off-site water around the site should be constructed
with internal drainage works and erosion and sedimentation control facilities
implemented. Channels (both temporary
and permanent drainage pipes and culverts), earth bunds or sandbag barriers
should be provided on site to direct stormwater to silt removal
facilities. The design of the
temporary on-site drainage system will be undertaken by the contractor prior
to the commencement of construction; · The dikes or embankments for flood protection
should be implemented around the boundaries of earthwork areas. Temporary ditches should be provided to
facilitate the runoff discharge into an appropriate watercourse, through a
silt/ sediment trap. The sediment/
silt traps should be incorporated in the permanent drainage channels to
enhance deposition rates; · The design of efficient silt removal facilities
should be based on the guidelines in Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 2/23, which
states that the retention time for silt/ sand traps should be 5 minutes under
maximum flow conditions. Sizes may
vary depending upon the flow rate, but for a flow rate of 0.1 m3/s
a sedimentation basin of 30 m3 would be required and for a flow
rate of 0.5 m3/s the basin would be 150 m3. The detailed design of the sand/ silt traps
shall be undertaken by the contractor prior to the commencement of
construction; · All exposed earth areas should be completed and
vegetated as soon as possible after earthworks have been completed, or
alternatively, within 14 days of the cessation of earthworks where
practicable. Exposed slope surfaces
should be covered by tarpaulin or other means; · The overall slope of the site should be kept to a
minimum to reduce the erosive potential of surface water flows, and all
traffic areas and access roads protected by coarse stone ballast. An additional advantage accruing from the
use of crushed stone is the positive traction gained during prolonged periods
of inclement weather and the reduction of surface sheet flows; · All drainage facilities and erosion and sediment
control structures should be regularly inspected and maintained to ensure
proper and efficient operation at all times and particularly following
rainstorms. Deposited silt and grit
should be removed regularly and disposed of by spreading evenly over stable,
vegetated areas; · Measures should be taken to minimize the ingress
of site drainage into excavations. If
the excavation of trenches in wet periods is necessary, they should be dug
and backfilled in short sections wherever practicable. Water pumped out from trenches or
foundation excavations should be discharged into storm drains via silt
removal facilities; · Open stockpiles of construction materials (for
example, aggregates, sand and fill material) of more than 50m3
should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric during rainstorms. Measures should be taken to prevent the
washing away of construction materials, soil, silt or debris into any
drainage system; · Manholes should always be adequately covered and
temporarily sealed so as to prevent silt, construction materials or debris
being washed into the drainage system and storm runoff being directed into
foul sewers; · Precautions be taken at any time of year when
rainstorms are likely, actions to be taken when a rainstorm is imminent or
forecasted, and actions to be taken during or after rainstorms are summarized
in Appendix A2 of ProPECC PN 2/23.
Particular attention should be paid to the control of silty surface
runoff during storm events, especially for areas located near steep slopes; · All vehicles and plant should be cleaned before
leaving a construction site to ensure no earth, mud, debris and the like is
deposited by them on roads. An
adequately designed and site wheel washing facilities should be provided at
every construction site exit where practicable. Wash-water should have sand and silt
settled out and removed at least on a weekly basis to ensure the continued
efficiency of the process. The section
of access road leading to, and exiting from, the wheel wash bay to the public
road should be paved with sufficient backfall toward the wheel wash bay to
prevent vehicle tracking of soil and silty water to public roads and drains; · Oil interceptors should be provided in the
drainage system downstream of any oil/ fuel pollution sources. The oil interceptors should be emptied and
cleaned regularly to prevent the release of oil and grease into the storm
water drainage system after accidental spillage. A bypass should be provided for the oil
interceptors to prevent flushing during heavy rain; · Construction solid waste, debris and rubbish on
site should be collected, handled and disposed of properly to avoid water
quality impacts; · All fuel tanks and storage areas should be
provided with locks and sited on sealed areas, within bunds of a capacity
equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the largest tank to prevent spilled
fuel oils from reaching water sensitive receivers nearby; · Adopt best management practices; · All earth works should be conducted sequentially
to limit the amount of construction runoff generated from exposed areas
during the wet season (April to September) as far as practicable. |
To minimize water quality impact from the
construction site runoff and general construction activities |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-EIAO · TM-DSS |
Implemented, rectified after observation for 14th
bullet. Implemented for the 1st, 3rd,
7th to 11th, 13th, 14th to 16th
bullets N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S6.9.1.2 |
W2 |
Tunnelling Works and Underground Works · Cut-&-cover tunnelling work should be conducted sequentially to limit the amount of construction runoff generated
from exposed areas during the wet
season (April to September) as far as practicable. · Uncontaminated discharge should pass through
sedimentation tanks prior to off-site discharge; · The wastewater with a high concentration of SS
should be treated (e.g. by sedimentation tanks with sufficient retention
time) before discharge. Oil
interceptors would also be required to remove oil, lubricants and grease from
the wastewater; · Direct discharge of the bentonite slurry (as a
result of D-wall) is not allowed. It
should be reconditioned and reused wherever practicable. Temporary storage locations (typically a
properly closed warehouse) should be provided on site for any unused
bentonite that needs to be transported away after all the related
construction activities area completed.
The requirements in ProPECC PN 2/23 should be adhered to in the
handling and disposal of bentonite slurries. |
To minimize construction water quality impact
from tunnelling works |
Contractor |
All tunnelling portion |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-DSS · TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S6.9.1.3 |
W3 |
Sewage Effluent · Portable chemical toilets and sewage holding
tanks are recommended for handling the construction sewage generated by the
workforce. A licensed contractor
should be employed to provide appropriate and adequate portable toilets and
be responsible for appropriate disposal and maintenance. |
To minimize water quality from sewage effluent |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · TM-DSS |
Implemented |
|
|
S6.9.1.5 |
W4 |
Groundwater from Potential Contaminated Area: · No direct discharge of groundwater from
contaminated areas should be adopted. · A discharge license under the WPCO through the
Regional Office of EPD for
groundwater discharge should be applied. Prior to the excavation works within these potentially
contaminated areas, the groundwater
quality should be reviewed during the process of discharge license application. The
compliance to the Technical Memorandum on
Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage on Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters (TM-DSS)
and the existence of prohibited substance should be confirmed. If the review results indicated that
the groundwater to be generated from the
excavation works would be contaminated, the contaminated groundwater should be either
properly treated in compliance with the
requirements of the TM-DSS or properly recharged into the ground. · If wastewater treatment is deployed, the
wastewater treatment unit shall deploy suitable treatment process (e.g. oil interceptor / activated carbon) to reduce the pollution level
to an acceptable standard and remove any
prohibited substances (e.g. TPH) to undetectable range. All treated effluent from wastewater treatment plant shall meet the requirements as
stated in TM-DSS and should be discharged
into the foul sewers. · If groundwater recharging wells are deployed,
recharging wells should be installed as
appropriate for recharging the contaminated groundwater back into the ground. The recharging wells should be selected at places where the
groundwater quality will not be affected by
the recharge operation as indicated in the Section 2.3 of TM-DSS. The baseline groundwater
quality shall be determined prior to
the selection of the recharge wells, and submit a working plan (including the laboratory
analytical results showing the quality of groundwater at the proposed recharge
location(s) as well as the pollutant levels of groundwater to be recharged)
to EPD for agreement. Pollution levels of groundwater to be recharged shall
not be higher than pollutant levels of ambient groundwater at the recharge
well. Prior to recharge, any prohibited substances such as TPH products
should be removed as necessary by installing the petrol interceptor. |
To minimize groundwater quality impact from
contaminated area |
Contractor |
Excavation areas where contamination is found |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · TM-DSS · TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S6.9.1.6 |
W6 |
Accidental Spillage In order to prevent accidental spillage of
chemicals, the following is recommended: · All the tanks, containers, storage area should be
bunded and the locations should be locked as far as possible from the
sensitive watercourse and stormwater drains; · The Contractor should register as a chemical
waste producer if chemical wastes would be generated. Storage of chemical waste arising from the
construction activities should be stored with suitable labels and warnings. Disposal of chemical wastes should be conducted
in compliance with the requirements as stated in the Waste Disposal (Chemical
Waste) (General) Regulation. |
To minimize water quality impact from accidental
spillage |
Contractor |
All construction site where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-EIAO · TM-DSS |
Implemented, rectified after observation for 1st
bullet. Implemented for others bullet. |
|
|
Waste
Management (Construction Waste) |
|||||||||
|
S7.4.1 |
WM1 |
On-site sorting of C&D material · Geological assessment should be carried out by
competent persons on site during excavation to identify materials which are
not suitable to use as aggregate in structural concrete (e.g. volcanic rock,
Aplite dyke rock, etc.). Volcanic rock
and Aplite dyke rock should be separated at the source sites as far as
practicable and stored at designated stockpile area preventing them from
delivering to crushing facilities. The
crushing plant operator should also be reminded to set up measures to prevent
unsuitable rock from ending up at concrete batching plants and be turned into
concrete for structural use. Details
regarding control measures at source site and crushing facilities should be
submitted by the Contractor for the Engineer to review and agree. In addition, site records should also be
kept for the types of rock materials excavated and the traceability of
delivery will be ensured with the implementation of Trip Ticket System and
enforced by site supervisory staff as stipulated under DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010
for tracking of the correct delivery to the rock crushing facilities for
processing into aggregates.
Alternative disposal option for the reuse of volcanic rock and Aplite
Dyke rock, etc. should be explored. |
Separation of unsuitable rock from ending up at
concrete batching plants and be turned into concrete for structural use |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· DEVB (W) No. 6/2010 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM2 |
Construction and Demolition Material · Maintain temporary stockpiles and reuse excavated
fill material for backfilling and reinstatement; · Carry out on-site sorting; · Make provisions in the Contract documents to
allow and promote the use of recycled aggregates where appropriate; · Adopt ‘selective demolition’ technique to
demolish the existing structures and facilities with a view to recovering
broken concrete effectively for recycling purpose, where possible; · Implement a trip-ticket system for each works
contract to ensure that the disposal of C&D materials is properly
documented and verified; and · Implement an enhanced Waste Management Plan
similar to ETWBTC (Works) No. 19/2005 – “Environmental Management on
Construction Sites” to encourage on-site sorting of C&D materials and to
minimize their generation during the course of construction. |
Good site practice to minimize the waste
generation and recycle the C&D materials as far as practicable so as to
reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance · Waste Disposal Ordinance · ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 |
Implemented for the 1st, 2nd,
3rd, 5th, 6th bullets N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM3 |
C&D Waste · Standard formwork or pre-fabrication should be
used as far as practicable in order to minimize the arising of C&D
materials. The use of more durable
formwork or plastic facing for the construction works should be
considered. Use of wooden hoardings
should not be used, as in other projects.
Metal hoarding should be used to enhance the possibility of recycling. The purchasing of construction materials
will be carefully planned in order to avoid over ordering and wastage; · The Contractor should recycle as much of the
C&D materials as possible on-site. Public fill and C&D waste should
be segregated and stored in different containers or skips to enhance reuse or
recycling of materials and their proper disposal. Where practicable, concrete and masonry can
be crushed and used as fill. Steel
reinforcement bar can be used by scrap steel mills. Different areas of the sites should be
considered for such segregation and storage. |
Good site practice to minimize the waste
generation and recycle the C&D materials as far as practicable so as to
reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance · Waste Disposal Ordinance · ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM4 |
Excavated Contaminated Soils · Details of the mitigation measures on handling of
the contaminated soil shall be referred to Section on Land Contamination
below. |
The contaminated soil will be excavated for on-site reuse |
Contractor |
PBH4 |
Prior to commencement of construction works within the contaminated area |
· Practice Guide (PG) for Investigation and
Remediation of Contaminated Land · GN/GM for land contamination |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM5 |
Land-based Sediment · All construction plant and equipment shall be
designed and maintained to minimize
the risk of silt, sediments, contaminants or other pollutants being released into the water
column or deposited in the
locations other than designated location; · All vessels shall be sized such that adequate
draft is maintained between vessels and the
sea bed at all states of the tide to ensure that undue turbidity is not generated by turbulence from vessel movement or propeller wash; · Before moving the vessels which are used for
transporting dredged material, excess
material shall be cleaned from the decks and exposed fittings of vessels and the excess materials shall never be dumped into the sea except at the
approved locations; · Adequate freeboard shall be maintained on barges
to ensure that decks are not washed by
wave action. · The Contractors shall monitor all vessels
transporting material to ensure that no dumping outside the approved location takes place. The Contractor shall keep and produce logs
and other records to demonstrate
compliance and that journeys are consistent with designated locations and copies of such records shall be submitted to the engineers; · The Contractors shall comply with the conditions
in the dumping license. · All bottom dumping vessels (Hopper barges) shall
be fitted with tight fittings seals to
their bottom openings to prevent leakage of material; · The material shall be placed into the disposal
pit by bottom dumping; · Contaminated marine mud shall be transported by
spit barge of not less than 750m3
capacity and capable of rapid opening and discharge at the disposal site; · Discharge shall be undertaken rapidly, and the
hoppers shall be closed immediately.
Material adhering to the sides of the hopper shall not be washed out of the hopper and the
hopper shall remain closed until the
barge returns to the disposal site. · For Type 3 special disposal treatment, sealing of
contaminant with geosynthetic
containment before dropping designated mud pit would be a possible arrangement. A
geosynthetic containment method is a
method whereby the sediments are sealed in geosynthetic containers and, the containers would be dropped into the designated contaminated mud pit
where they would be covered by
further mud disposal and later by the mud pit capping at the disposal site, thereby
fulfilling the requirements for fully confined mud disposal. |
To control pollution due to marine sediment |
Contractor |
Along CKR alignment |
Construction stage |
· ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM6 |
Chemical Waste · Chemical waste that is produced, as defined by
Schedule 1 of the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation,
should be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes; · Containers used for the storage of chemical
wastes should be suitable for the substance they are holding, resistant to
corrosion, maintained in a good condition, and securely closed, have a
capacity of less than 450 L unless the specification has been approved by
EPD, and display a label in English and Chinese in accordance with
instructions prescribed in Schedule 2 of the regulation; · The storage area for chemical wastes should be
clearly labelled and used solely for the storage of chemical waste, enclosed
on at least 3 sides, have an impermeable floor and bunding of sufficient
capacity to accommodate 110% of the volume of the largest container or 20% of
the total volume of waste stored in that area, whichever is the greatest,
have adequate ventilation, covered to prevent rainfall entering, and arranged
so that incompatible materials are adequately separated; · Disposal of chemical waste should be via a
licensed waste collector, be to a facility licensed to receive chemical
waste, such as the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre which also offers a
chemical waste collection service and can supply the necessary storage
containers, or be to a reuser of the waste, under approval from EPD. |
Control the chemical waste and ensure proper
storage, handling and disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General)
Regulation · Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and
Storage of Chemical Waste |
Implemented for the 2nd and 3rd
bullet. N/A for other bullet. |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM7 |
General Refuse · General refuse generated on-site should be stored
in enclosed bins or compaction units separately from construction and
chemical wastes; · A reputable waste collector should be employed by
the Contractor to remove general refuse from the site, separately from
construction and chemical wastes, on a daily basis to minimize odour, pest
and litter impacts. Burning of refuse
on construction sites is prohibited by law. · Aluminium cans are often recovered from the waste
stream by individual collectors if they are segregated and made easily
accessible. Separate labelled bins for
their deposit should be provided if feasible; · Office wastes can be reduced through the
recycling of paper if volumes are large enough to warrant collection. Participation in a local collection scheme
should be considered by the Contractor. |
Minimize production of the general refuse and
avoid odour, pest and litter impacts |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Waste Disposal Ordinance |
Implemented. |
|
|
Hazard to
Life |
|||||||||
|
H8 |
The driver
and his assistant should be physically healthy, experienced and have good
safe driving records. The driver
should hold a proper driving licence for the approved transport truck. Dedicated training programme and regular
road safety briefing sessions/ workshops should be provided to enhance their
safe driving attitude and practice.
Smoking should be strictly prohibited. |
To reduce the risk during explosives transport |
Contractor |
Works areas at which explosives would be used |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
||
|
S9.18 |
H9 |
Emergency response plans in case of road accident
should be prepared and implemented. The
driver and his assistant should be familiar with the emergency procedures
including evacuation, and proper communication/ fire-fighting equipment
should be provided to the driver and his assistant. |
To reduce the risk during explosives transport |
Contractor |
Works areas at which explosives would be used |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
Landscape & Visual |
|||||||||
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV3 |
Good Site Management · Large temporary stockpiles of excavated material
shall be covered with unobtrusive sheeting to prevent dust and dirt spreading
to adjacent landscape areas and vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy
visual appearance. · Construction plant and building material shall be
orderly and carefully stored in order to create a neat and tidy visual
appearance. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
Within Project site |
Construction stage |
- |
Implemented for the 2nd bullet N/A for another bullet |
|
|
LV4 |
Screen Hoarding ·
Decorative
screen hoarding should be erected to screen the public from the construction
area. It should be designed to be
compatible with the existing urban context. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
Within Project site |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
||
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV5 |
Lighting Control during Construction · All lighting in the construction site shall be
carefully controlled to minimize light pollution and night-time glare to
nearby residencies and GIC. The
Contractor shall consider other security measures, which shall minimize the
visual impacts. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
Within Project site |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV6 |
Erosion Control · The potential for soil erosion shall be reduced
by minimizing the extent of vegetation disturbance on site and by providing a
protective cover over newly exposed soil. |
Minimize
landscape impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV7 |
Tree Protection & Preservation · Carefully protected during construction. Tree protection measures will be detailed
at the Tree Removal Application stage and plans submitted to the relevant
Government Department for approval in due course in accordance with ETWB TC No.
3/2006. |
Minimize
landscape and visual impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
· ‘Guidelines for Tree Risk Management and
Assessment Arrangement on an Area Basis and on a Tree Basis’, Greening,
Landscape and Tree Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB · Latest recommended horticultural practices from
GLTM Section, DEVB |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV8 |
Tree Transplantation · For trees unavoidably affected by the Project
that have to be removed, where practical transplantation will be chosen as
the top priority method of removal. If
this is not possible or practical compensatory planting will be provided for
trees unavoidably felled (See LV10).
For trees unavoidably affected by the Project works that are
transplanted, transplantation must be carried out in accordance with ETWB TCW
2/2004 and 3/2006. |
Minimize
landscape and visual impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site and designated off-site locations |
Prior to
Construction stage |
· ETWB TCW 3/2006 · Latest recommended horticultural practices from
Greening, Landscape and Tree Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB · ETWB TCW 2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV9 |
Compensatory Planting · For trees unavoidably affected by the Project
that have to be removed, where practical transportation will be chosen as the
top priority method of removal but if this is not possible or practical
compensatory planting will be provided for trees unavoidably felled. All felled trees shall be compensated for
by planting trees to the satisfaction of relevant Government projects. Required numbers and locations of
compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately with Government
during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWB TC 3/2006. · Compensatory tree planting may be incorporated
into public open spaces and along roadside amenity areas affected by the
construction works and therefore be part of the bigger wider planting
plans. Onsite compensation planting is
preferred but, if necessary, additional receptor sites outside the Works Area
shall be agreed separately with the Government during the Tree Felling
Application process. |
Minimize
visual impact and also enhance landscape |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
· ETWB TCW 3/2006 · Latest recommended horticultural practices from
Greening, Landscape and Tree Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB · ETWB TCW 2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV10 |
Screen Planting · Tall screen/buffer trees, shrubs and climbers
should be planted, in so far as is possible, to soften and screen proposed
structures such as roads and central strip, vertical edges and buildings and
to enhance streetscape greening effect where appropriate. Indiscriminate use
of trees for screening must be avoided and the principle of ‘right tree for
the right place’ must be followed. This detail will be provided at the
Detailed Design stage. This measure may additionally form part of the
compensatory planting and will improve and create a pleasant pedestrian
environment. |
Minimize
visual impact and also enhance
landscape. |
Contractor |
Within Project Site |
Construction Phase |
· Guidelines on Greening of Noise Barriers, issued
April 2012, GLTMS, DevB · ETWB TCW 2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV12 |
Reinstatement · All works areas, excavated areas and disturbed
areas for tunnel construction and temporary road diversion or any other
proposed works shall be reinstated to former conditions or better, with
reasonable landscape treatment and to the satisfaction of the relevant
Government departments. (Specific mitigation for disturbance to public open
space is detailed separately under LV14.) |
Minimize landscape impact |
Contractor |
Within Project Site |
Construction Phase |
· N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Cultural Heritage Impact (Construction Phase) |
|||||||||
|
S11.4.4 |
CH1 |
The contractor should be alerted during the
construction on the possibility of locating archaeological remains and as a
precautionary measure, AMO shall be informed immediately in case of discovery
of antiquities or supposed antiquities in the subject sites. |
To preserve any cultural heritage items which may
be removed and damaged by the excavation |
Contractor |
During construction works for cut and cover
tunnels |
Construction stage |
· AMOs requirements |
N/A |
|
|
EM&A Project |
|||||||||
|
S13.2 |
EM1 |
An Independent Environmental Checker needs to be
employed as per the EM&A Manual |
Control EM&A Performance |
Highways Department |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· EIAO Guidance Note No. 4/2010 · TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
S13.2-13.4 |
EM2 |
· An Environmental Team needs to be employed as per
the EM&A Manual; · Prepare a systematic Environmental Management
Plan to ensure effective implementation of the mitigation measures; · An environmental impact monitoring needs to be
implemented by the Environmental Team to ensure all the requirements given in
the EM&A Manual are fully complied with. |
Perform environmental monitoring & auditing |
Highways Department/ Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· EIAO Guidance Note No. 4/2010 · TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
Appendix G
Location Plan of Air Quality and Noise
Monitoring Station

Appendix H
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
and Coming Month
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month (December
2025)

Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month (January
2026)

Appendix I
Calibration Certificates for Air Quality
Monitoring Equipment

Appendix J
Air Quality Monitoring Results and their
Graphical Presentations



Data
of Wind Direction Extracted from Kai Tak Wind Station of the Hong Kong
Observatory










Data
of Wind Speed Extracted from Kai Tak Wind Station of the Hong Kong Observatory










Appendix K
Calibration Certificates for Noise Monitoring
Equipment





Appendix L
Noise Monitoring Results and their Graphical
Presentations



Appendix M
Waste Flow Table
Appendix N
Statistics on Complaint, Notifications of
Summons and Successful Prosecution
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
|
1 December 2025 - 31 December 2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Non-compliance
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Non-compliance Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 December 2025 - 31 December
2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Summons Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 December 2025 - 31 December
2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Prosecution Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 December 2025 - 31 December
2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
